www.switbogowrp.fora.pl

cleoy8g5s

Seat Belt Defects - More Common Than You Think
Defective seat belts may not properly restrain occupants of a vehicle due to poor manufacturing or design. These malfunctions include:
The purpose of wearing a seat belt is so that it can prevent or minimize what is called the second collision. The first collision is when the vehicle makes an impact with another vehicle or object. The driver or passenger of the vehicle is either ejected from the vehicle or is injured because of impact with a car's interior, which occurs in the second collision. Seat belt use helps protect a car's occupants from fatal second collisions with a vehicle's windshield, steering wheel, or roof.
Though the national average for seat belt use is at a high of 71 percent, due [url=http://www.rtnagel.com/airjordan.php]nike air jordan pas cher[/url] mainly to a $3.7 million "Click It or Ticket" campaign which used paid advertising to encourage seat belt use, nearly 10,000 out of roughly 30,000 automobile crash deaths in 1999 were related to the failure to [url=http://www.gotprintsigns.com/monclerpascher/]moncler pas cher[/url] use seat belts.
Seat belt litigation is a crucial factor in automobile crashworthiness claims. If you have suffered injury due to seat belt failure, contact an experienced crashworthiness attorney. Consulting with an experienced automobile crash attorney about details of a seat belt lawsuit may result in monetary compensation.
Some Seat [url=http://www.sandvikfw.net/shopuk.php]hollister sale[/url] Belt Buckles Safer Than Others
. "Inertial unlatching", which takes place when a seat belt becomes unlatched during a collision. Buckles without a "lock-for-the-latch" design are more susceptible to inertial unlatching, in which the latch plate pulls out of the seat belt's buckle. In 1982, a patent by General Motors said that a properly designed latch should be physically blocked in the latched position to prevent unlatching by inertia forces acting on the vehicle body. Despite these warnings, anti-inertial unlatching features are still not used in all seat belt buckles in new cars and the United States government has [url=http://www.gotprintsigns.com/hollisterpascher/‎]hollister pas cher[/url] largely ignored inertial unlatching in its safety guidelines.
. Seat belt durability is key. This includes the material and weaving of the belt itself in addition to seat belts that have too much slack and thus load too quickly, disabling the belt's protective webbing. Faulty seat belt retractors are also implicated in seat belt durability accidents.
. "False latching", which occurs when a seat belt buckle appears to be closed, but is not. If an individual is not properly restrained [url=http://www.maximoupgrade.com/hot.php]hollister[/url] and instead are falsely latched, they may be at risk for ejection from a vehicle. A seat belt is considered to be falsely latched if it pulls free at less than five pounds of pull. False latching can cause passenger ejection from a moving vehicle or [url=http://www.1855sacramento.com/moncler.php]moncler sito ufficiale[/url] serious injury when the passenger collides with the interior of the car.
Source: from [url=http://www.maximoupgrade.com/hot.php]hollister france[/url] ArticlesFactory.com
Manufactures are not willing to make information public regarding seat belt buckles that are more prone to fail during crashes. Consumers are unable to make the distinction between safer safety belt models and what type of seat belt is in their vehicles until the information becomes available to the public. Because seat belts become released during a crash, it is hard to statistically tell how many people are killed or injured every year due to their seat belt [url=http://www.thehygienerevolution.com/barbour.php]barbour paris[/url] buckle.
These numbers are not reflective of individuals harmed or killed because of faulty seat belts. In fact, each year a number of car companies recall automobiles due to defects in seat belt design.
Seat belts have the ability to better protect vehicle occupants from fatal accidents than anything else. According to federal statistics, in 2003, the use of seat belts saved nearly 15,000 lives nationwide. However, [url=http://www.1855sacramento.com/peuterey.php]peuterey outlet[/url] even more than 6,000 deaths per year are related to the improper use -- or the [url=http://www.vivid-host.com/barbour.htm]barbour uk[/url] failure to use -- the proper seat belt restraints during a car crash.

In addition to the importance of saving lives, seat belts [url=http://www.achbanker.com/home.php]hollister[/url] also save the economy billions of dollars. Every year, seat belts save society approximately $50 billion in medical care, lost [url=http://www.1855sacramento.com/peuterey.php]peuterey[/url] productivity and other injury-related costs nationwide. But seat belt failure has tremendous costs.
相关的主题文章：

[url=http://www.0311zx.net/thread-17088-1-1.html]doudoune moncler Essential Tree Surgery Equipment[/url]

[url=http://ty.dgjyw.com/wMcms_GuestBook.asp]www.vivid-[/url]

[url=http://www.dtmz.gov.cn/E_GuestBook.asp]barbour sa[/url]

cleoy8g5s

Le texte prévoit aussi la création d'une banque de données publique des ?uvres indisponibles, t?che [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] qui devrait être confiée à la Bibliothèque nationale [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] de France. Il confie aussi la gestion collective des droits numériques sur les ?uvres indisponibles [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] à une société de perception et de répartition des droits, assurant, de fa?on paritaire, une rémunération aux éditeurs et aux auteurs.
Selon la proposition, les 500 000 à 700 000 titres indisponibles seront numérisés [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] et il reviendra à l'auteur de s' pour que son ?uvre ne figure pas dans le corpus des titres qui seront par la suite commercialisés.
"Il nous appara?t que [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] ce texte ne répond pas à l'objectif affiché de la protection des auteurs et l'accès de tous aux ouvrages considérés [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] comme introuvables", expliquent les signataires de la pétition, estimant que ni l'Etat ni les éditeurs ne possèdent les droits numériques sur ces ?uvres. "Il est impératif que les contrats soient tous revus avec les auteurs et ayants droit pour que cette numérisation de [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] masse soit possible", font-ils [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] également .
"UN OFFICIEL ET G?N?RAL"
Lire (en accès payant) le compte rendu
". C'est en ces termes que des auteurs et des ayants droit ont dénoncé, [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] lundi 20 février, dans une pétition à destination des députés et sénateurs, la loi sur la numérisation des ?uvres sous droit indisponibles du [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] XXe siècle.
"Nous appelons (...) à purement et simplement [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] cette proposition de loi qui ne ferait qu' un piratage officiel et général des ?uvres [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] littéraires du XXe siècle sous [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] la forme d'une atteinte sans précédent au droit de propriété, ici celui des auteurs", conclut la pétition.
Cette loi prévoit de accessible sous forme numérique l'ensemble de la production littéraire fran?aise du siècle dernier, dès lors que les ?uvres ne sont plus exploitées commercialement [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] mais pas pour autant tombées dans le domaine public – ce qui intervient soixante-dix ans après la mort de leur auteur.
Le texte, qui rassemble de nombreux écrivains réunis sous le collectif Le Droit du serf [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] et s'intitule "Le droit d'auteur doit inaliénable", est hébergée sur le site .
Le Sénat a donné le 13 février son accord à la proposition de loi, adoptée en première lecture. L'Assemblée devrait à son tour le texte mercredi, ce qui vaudra adoption définitive.